Citation Analysis – Yurinskii's Coupling for Martingales

Yurinskii's Coupling for Martingales
Matias D. Cattaneo, Ricardo P. Masini, William G. Underwood
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.00362

158

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,995

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Li, J. and Liao, Z	2020	20	6	35.0	0.127	1.000	100%
2	Belloni, A. and Oliveira, R. I	2018	8	3	10.5	0.051	0.957	88%
3	Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K	2014b	5	5	7.5	0.032	0.928	80%
4			14	6	18.0	0.089	0.894	71%
5	Berthet, P. and Mason, D. M	2006	6	2	10.0	0.038	0.874	100%
6	Pollard, D	2002	4	3	4.5	0.025	0.843	75%
7	Komlos, J., Major, P., and Tusnady, G	1975	3	3	5.0	0.019	0.843	100%
8	Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., an...	2019	4	4	5.5	0.025	0.843	75%
9	van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A	1996	10	5	13.0	0.063	0.843	60%
10	Cattaneo, M. D., Farrell, M. H., and Feng, Y (self)	2020	9	3	11.0	0.057	0.822	56%
11	Zaitsev, A. Y	1987a	3	2	4.0	0.019	0.737	100%
12	Zaitsev, A. Y	1987b	3	2	4.0	0.019	0.737	100%
13	Le Cam, L	1988	3	3	3.5	0.019	0.737	67%
14	Chen, X. and Kato, K	2020	4	3	4.0	0.025	0.737	50%
15	Monrad, D. and Philipp, W	1991	3	3	3.5	0.019	0.737	67%
16	Dudley, R. M	1999	3	3	4.5	0.019	0.737	67%
17	Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K	2014a	3	3	4.5	0.019	0.737	67%
18	Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., an...	2015	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
19	Bradley, R. C	2005	2	2	4.0	0.013	0.644	100%
20	Cattaneo, M. D. and Yu, R. R (self)	2025	2	2	4.0	0.013	0.644	100%
21	Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K	2013	3	3	3.0	0.019	0.585	33%
22	Biau, G. and Mason, D. M	2015	2	2	1.5	0.013	0.511	50%
23	Yurinskii, V. V	1978	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
24	Csorgo, M. and Revesz, P	1981	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
25	Lindvall, T	1992	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
26	Anastasiou, A., Balasubramanian, K., and Erdogdu, ...	2019	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
27	Ray, K. and van der Vaart, A	2021	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
28	Cattaneo, M. D., Feng, Y., and Underwood, W. G (self)	2024	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
29	Dudley, R. M. and Philipp, W	1983	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
30	Dehling, H	1983	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
31	Sheehy, A. and Wellner, J. A	1992	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
32	Chatterjee, S	2006	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
33	Wu, W. B. and Woodroofe, M	2004	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
34	Wu, W. B	2005	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
35	Dedecker, J., Merlevede, F., and Volny, D	2007	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
36	Zhao, O. and Woodroofe, M	2008	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
37	Peligrad, M	2010	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
38	Atchade, Y. F. and Cattaneo, M. D (self)	2014	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
39	Cuny, C. and Merlevede, F	2014	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
40	Magda, P. and Zhang, N	2018	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
41	McLeish, D. L	1975	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
42	Fan, J., Li, R., Zhang, C.-H., and Zou, H	2020	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
43	Gine, E., Koltchinskii, V., and Sakhanenko, L	2004	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
44	van de Geer, S. A	2000	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
45	Rakhlin, A., Sridharan, K., and Tewari, A	2015	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
46	Fan, J. and Gijbels, I	1996	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
47	Eggermont, P. P. B. and LaRiccia, V. N	2009	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
48	Rio, E	1994	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
49	Giessing, A	2023	4	1	2.0	0.025	0.139	0%
50	Merlevede, F., Peligrad, M., and Rio, E	2009	3	1	1.5	0.019	0.126	0%
51	Nazarov, F	2003	2	1	1.0	0.013	0.110	0%
52	Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K	2017	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%
53	Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Koike, Y	2023	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%
54	Bhatia, R	1997	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%
55	Lopes, M. E., Lin, Z., and Muller, H.-G	2020	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%
56	Kozbur, D	2021	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%
57	Rio, E	2017	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%
58	van de Geer, S. and Lederer, J	2013	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Li, J. and Liao, Z

2020

35.0

0.127

1.000

100%

Belloni, A. and Oliveira, R. I

2018

10.5

0.051

0.957

88%

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K

2014b

7.5

0.032

0.928

80%

18.0

0.089

0.894

71%

Berthet, P. and Mason, D. M

2006

10.0

0.038

0.874

100%

Pollard, D

2002

4.5

0.025

0.843

75%

Komlos, J., Major, P., and Tusnady, G

1975

5.0

0.019

0.843

100%

Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., an...

2019

5.5

0.025

0.843

75%

van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A

1996

13.0

0.063

0.843

60%

Cattaneo, M. D., Farrell, M. H., and Feng, Y (self)

2020

11.0

0.057

0.822

56%

Zaitsev, A. Y

1987a

4.0

0.019

0.737

100%

Zaitsev, A. Y

1987b

4.0

0.019

0.737

100%

Le Cam, L

1988

3.5

0.019

0.737

67%

Chen, X. and Kato, K

2020

4.0

0.025

0.737

50%

Monrad, D. and Philipp, W

1991

3.5

0.019

0.737

67%

Dudley, R. M

1999

4.5

0.019

0.737

67%

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K

2014a

4.5

0.019

0.737

67%

Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., an...

2015

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Bradley, R. C

2005

4.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Cattaneo, M. D. and Yu, R. R (self)

2025

4.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K

2013

3.0

0.019

0.585

33%

Biau, G. and Mason, D. M

2015

1.5

0.013

0.511

50%

Yurinskii, V. V

1978

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Csorgo, M. and Revesz, P

1981

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Lindvall, T

1992

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Anastasiou, A., Balasubramanian, K., and Erdogdu, ...

2019

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Ray, K. and van der Vaart, A

2021

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Cattaneo, M. D., Feng, Y., and Underwood, W. G (self)

2024

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Dudley, R. M. and Philipp, W

1983

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Dehling, H

1983

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Sheehy, A. and Wellner, J. A

1992

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Chatterjee, S

2006

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Wu, W. B. and Woodroofe, M

2004

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Wu, W. B

2005

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Dedecker, J., Merlevede, F., and Volny, D

2007

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Zhao, O. and Woodroofe, M

2008

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Peligrad, M

2010

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Atchade, Y. F. and Cattaneo, M. D (self)

2014

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Cuny, C. and Merlevede, F

2014

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Magda, P. and Zhang, N

2018

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

McLeish, D. L

1975

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Fan, J., Li, R., Zhang, C.-H., and Zou, H

2020

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Gine, E., Koltchinskii, V., and Sakhanenko, L

2004

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

van de Geer, S. A

2000

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rakhlin, A., Sridharan, K., and Tewari, A

2015

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Fan, J. and Gijbels, I

1996

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Eggermont, P. P. B. and LaRiccia, V. N

2009

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rio, E

1994

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Giessing, A

2023

2.0

0.025

0.139

Merlevede, F., Peligrad, M., and Rio, E

2009

1.5

0.019

0.126

Nazarov, F

2003

1.0

0.013

0.110

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K

2017

0.5

0.006

0.087

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Koike, Y

2023

0.5

0.006

0.087

Bhatia, R

1997

0.5

0.006

0.087

Lopes, M. E., Lin, Z., and Muller, H.-G

2020

0.5

0.006

0.087

Kozbur, D

2021

0.5

0.006

0.087

Rio, E

2017

0.5

0.006

0.087

van de Geer, S. and Lederer, J

2013

0.5

0.006

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.