← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

A Generalized Argmax Theorem with Applications
Gregory Cox
https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08793
89
Citation mentions
44
Cited references
7
Sections
9,231
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 van der Vaart, A. and Wellner, J 1996 9 4 15.0 0.101 1.000 100%
2 Andrews, D. and Cheng, X 2012 5 2 10.0 0.056 0.874 100%
3 Cox, G (self) 2022 5 2 10.0 0.056 0.874 100%
4 Aubin, J.-P. and Frankowska, H 1990 4 3 5.0 0.045 0.737 50%
5 Cox, G (self) 2020 4 3 5.0 0.045 0.737 50%
6 Bai, J 1997 15 2 18.0 0.169 0.678 47%
7 Silvapulle, M. and Sen, P 2005 3 1 6.0 0.034 0.585 100%
8 Stock, J. and Wright, J 2000 3 1 6.0 0.034 0.585 100%
9 Jiang, L., Wang, X., and Yu, J 2018 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
10 Casini, A. and Perron, P 2021 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
11 Andrews, D 1999 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
12 Kim, J. and Pollard, D 1990 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
13 Kosorok, M 2008 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
14 Ferger, D 2004 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
15 Seijo, E. and Sen, B 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Berge, C 1963 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Evans, J. and Gould, F 1970 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Casini, A. and Perron, P 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Hinkley, D 1970 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Elliott, G. and M\"uller, U 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Qu, Z. and Perron, P 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Muller, H.-G 1992 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Hansen, B 2000 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Hidalgo, J., Lee, J., and Seo, M.-H 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Andrews, D 2002 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Ketz, P 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P 2010 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Andrews, I. and Armstrong, T 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Ketz, P. and McCloskey, A 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Andrews, D 1997 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Andrews, D 2001 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Frazier, D. and Renault, E 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Moon, H. and Schorfheide, F 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Chen, X., Christensen, T., and Tamer, E 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Chernoff, D 1954 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Geyer, C 1994 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Feder, P 1968 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Moran, P 1971 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Kaido, H., Molinari, F., and Stoye, J 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Han, S. and McCloskey, A 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Andrews, D. and Cheng, X 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Andrews, D. and Cheng, X 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Dudley, R 2014 3 1 1.5 0.034 0.126 0%
44 Klebaner, F 2012 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.