← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\LargeA Structural Model for Detecting Communities in Networks
Alex Centeno
https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08380
224
Citation mentions
113
Cited references
7
Sections
6,931
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 De Paula, A., Richards-Shubik, S., and Tamer, E 2018 6 3 6.0 0.027 1.000 100%
2 Cohen-Cole, E., Liu, X., and Zenou, Y 2018 11 4 17.5 0.049 1.000 100%
3 Jackson, M. O. and Wolinsky, A 1996 6 3 8.0 0.027 1.000 100%
4 Graham, B. S 2017 11 6 19.0 0.049 1.000 100%
5 Sheng, S 2020 7 4 11.0 0.031 1.000 100%
6 Dzemski, A 2019 8 5 14.5 0.036 1.000 100%
7 Liu, X 2019 8 4 14.5 0.036 1.000 100%
8 Manski, C. F 1993 4 3 6.0 0.018 0.928 100%
9 Ballester, C., Calvo-Armengol, A., and Zenou, Y 2006 4 3 4.0 0.018 0.928 100%
10 Acemoglu, D., Bimpikis, K., and Ozdaglar, A 2014 4 3 4.0 0.018 0.928 100%
11 Lee, L.-f., Liu, X., and Lin, X 2010 4 3 5.5 0.018 0.928 100%
12 Renyi, E 1959 3 3 3.5 0.013 0.843 100%
13 Kelejian, H. H. and Prucha, I. R 2004 4 2 5.0 0.018 0.811 100%
14 Huang, D., Wang, F., Zhu, X., and Wang, H 2020 4 2 3.0 0.018 0.811 100%
15 Mueller-Frank, M. and Neri, C 2021 4 2 2.5 0.018 0.811 100%
16 Jackson, M. O. and Watts, A 2001 4 2 8.0 0.018 0.811 100%
17 Bramoulle, Y., Djebbari, H., and Fortin, B 2009 3 2 4.0 0.013 0.737 100%
18 Jackson, M. O. and Rogers, B. W 2007 3 2 3.0 0.013 0.737 100%
19 Leung, M. P 2020 3 2 3.0 0.013 0.737 100%
20 Mele, A 2017 3 2 4.5 0.013 0.737 100%
21 Jackson, M. O. and Watts, A 2002 3 2 4.5 0.013 0.737 100%
22 Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A. G., Duflo, E., and... 2013 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
23 Tamer, E 2003 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
24 Everett, M. G. and Borgatti, S. P 2013 2 2 1.5 0.009 0.644 100%
25 Bala, V. and Goyal, S 1998 2 2 1.5 0.009 0.644 100%
26 Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V. M., Ozdaglar, A., and T... 2012 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
27 Calvo-Armengol, A., De Mart\'\i, J., and Prat, A 2015 2 2 1.5 0.009 0.644 100%
28 Elhorst, J. P., Lacombe, D. J., and Piras, G 2012 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
29 Jackson, M. O 2003 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
30 Currarini, S., Jackson, M. O., and Pin, P 2009 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
31 Arieli, I. and Mueller-Frank, M 2017 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
32 De Paula, A 2020 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
33 Fernandez-Val, I. and Weidner, M 2016 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
34 Calvo-Armengol, A. and Zenou, Y 2004 3 1 3.0 0.013 0.585 100%
35 Acemoglu, D., Dahleh, M. A., Lobel, I., and Ozdagl... 2011 3 1 1.5 0.013 0.585 100%
36 Bloch, F. and Jackson, M. O 2007 3 1 6.0 0.013 0.585 100%
37 Aguirregabiria, V. and Mira, P 2007 3 1 6.0 0.013 0.585 100%
38 Patacchini, E. and Zenou, Y 2012 2 1 2.0 0.009 0.511 100%
39 Ambrus, A., Mobius, M., and Szeidl, A 2014 2 1 2.0 0.009 0.511 100%
40 Liu, X 2014 2 1 1.0 0.009 0.511 100%
41 Goyal, S. and Joshi, S 2006 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
42 Chamberlain, G 1984 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
43 Calvo-Armengol, A. and Jackson, M. O 2009 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
44 Kling, J. R., Ludwig, J., and Katz, L. F 2005 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
45 Fafchamps, M. and Gubert, F 2007 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
46 Calvo-Armengol, A. and Jackson, M. O 2004 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
47 Calvo-Armengol, A. and Jackson, M. O 2007 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
48 Moretti, E 2011 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
49 Bandiera, O. and Rasul, I 2006 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
50 Conley, T. G. and Udry, C. R 2010 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
51 Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., and Kinn... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
52 Jackson, M. O., Rogers, B., and Zenou, Y 2015 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
53 Brock, W. A. and Durlauf, S. N 2001 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
54 Brock, W. A. and Durlauf, S. N 2002 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
55 Brock, W. A. and Durlauf, S. N 2007 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
56 Durlauf, S. N 2004 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
57 Carmel, D. and Markovitch, S 1999 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
58 Johnson, C. and Gilles, R. P 2003 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
59 Sarkar, D., Andris, C., Chapman, C. A., and Sengup... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
60 Drukker, D. M., Egger, P. H., and Prucha, I. R 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
61 De Mart\'\i, J. and Zenou, Y 2015 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
62 Stadtfeld, C., Takacs, K., and Voros, A 2020 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
63 Moody, J. and White, D. R 2003 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
64 Stark, T. H., Flache, A., and Veenstra, R 2013 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
65 Fischer, C. S 1982 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
66 Yava\cs, M. and Yucel, G 2014 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
67 Bala, V. and Goyal, S 2000 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
68 Ehrhardt, G., Marsili, M., and Vega-Redondo, F 2007 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
69 Reggiani, A., Nijkamp, P., and Lanzi, D 2015 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
70 Baetz, O 2015 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
71 Ghiglino, C 2012 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
72 Borgatti, S. P. and Everett, M. G 1997 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
73 Chen, X., Chen, Y., and Xiao, P 2013 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
74 Watts, D. J. and Strogatz, S. H 1998 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
75 Newman, M. E., Watts, D. J., and Strogatz, S. H 2002 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
76 Barthelemy, M 2011 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
77 Arieli, I. and Mueller-Frank, M 2019 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
78 Gale, D. and Kariv, S 2003 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
79 Rosenberg, D., Solan, E., and Vieille, N 2009 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
80 Mossel, E., Sly, A., and Tamuz, O 2015 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
81 DeGroot, M. H 1974 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
82 Chandrasekhar, A. G., Larreguy, H., and Xandri, J.... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
83 Leung, M. P 2015 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
84 Fowler, J. H. and Christakis, N. A 2010 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
85 Coleman, J. S 1994 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
86 Jackson, M. O 2011 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
87 Kalai, E 2004 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
88 Choo, E. and Siow, A 2006 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
89 Austin, A., Linkletter, C., and Wu, Z 2013 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
90 LeSage, J. and Pace, R. K 2009 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
91 Maddala, G. S 1986 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
92 Alizadeh, M., Cioffi-Revilla, C., and Crooks, A 2017 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
93 Osborne, M. J. and Rubinstein, A 1994 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
94 Silva, J. S. and Tenreyro, S 2006 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
95 Shalizi, C. R. and Rinaldo, A 2013 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
96 Boucher, V., M. I 2017 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
97 Bloch, F. and Jackson, M. O 2006 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
98 Rothenberg, T. J 1971 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
99 Golub, B. and Jackson, M. O 2010 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
100 Goyal, S 2009 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
101 Cohen-Cole, E 2006 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
102 Xiao, R 2018 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
103 De Paula, A. and Tang, X 2012 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
104 Ciliberto, F. and Tamer, E 2009 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
105 Chatterjee, S., Diaconis, P., and Sly, A 2011 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
106 Arellano, M., Hahn, J., et al 2007 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
107 Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S 1976 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
108 Karlberg, M 1997 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
109 Hoff, P. D 2005 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
110 Amemiya, T 1978 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
111 Pesendorfer, M. and Schmidt-Dengler, P 2010 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
112 Kasahara, H. and Shimotsu, K 2012 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
113 Yan, T., Leng, C., and Zhu, J 2016 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.