← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Best Arm Identification with Contextual Information under a Small Gap
Masahiro Kato, Masaaki Imaizumi, Takuya Ishihara, Toru Kitagawa
https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07330
246
Citation mentions
102
Cited references
19
Sections
17,446
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 5 3 7.5 0.020 1.000 100%
2 9 3 15.0 0.037 1.000 100%
3 6 4 9.5 0.024 1.000 100%
4 8 5 15.0 0.033 1.000 100%
5 6 4 6.5 0.024 1.000 100%
6 6 4 6.5 0.024 1.000 100%
7 6 3 5.0 0.024 1.000 100%
8 9 5 15.0 0.037 0.962 89%
9 6 4 6.0 0.024 0.941 83%
10 26 9 37.5 0.106 0.931 81%
11 4 4 5.5 0.016 0.928 100%
12 4 3 6.5 0.016 0.928 100%
13 11 6 16.0 0.045 0.899 73%
14 3 3 3.5 0.012 0.843 100%
15 3 3 3.5 0.012 0.843 100%
16 9 6 12.0 0.037 0.822 56%
17 6 4 6.0 0.024 0.794 50%
18 3 2 2.0 0.012 0.737 100%
19 3 2 4.0 0.012 0.737 100%
20 3 2 2.0 0.012 0.737 100%
21 3 2 3.0 0.012 0.737 100%
22 3 2 1.5 0.012 0.737 100%
23 2 2 1.5 0.008 0.644 100%
24 2 2 1.5 0.008 0.644 100%
25 2 2 1.5 0.008 0.644 100%
26 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
27 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
28 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
29 2 2 4.0 0.008 0.644 100%
30 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
31 2 2 4.0 0.008 0.644 100%
32 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.644 100%
33 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
34 3 1 1.5 0.012 0.585 100%
35 2 1 2.0 0.008 0.511 100%
36 2 1 2.0 0.008 0.511 100%
37 2 2 2.5 0.008 0.511 50%
38 2 1 1.0 0.008 0.511 100%
39 2 1 1.0 0.008 0.511 100%
40 2 1 1.0 0.008 0.511 100%
41 2 1 4.0 0.008 0.511 100%
42 2 1 1.0 0.008 0.511 100%
43 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
44 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
45 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
46 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
47 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
48 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
49 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
50 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
51 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
52 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
53 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
54 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
55 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
56 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
57 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
58 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
59 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
60 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
61 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
62 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
63 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
64 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
65 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
66 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
67 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
68 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
69 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
70 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
71 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
72 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
73 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
74 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
75 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
76 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
77 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
78 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
79 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
80 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
81 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
82 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
83 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
84 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
85 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
86 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
87 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
88 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
89 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
90 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.406 100%
91 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
92 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
93 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
94 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
95 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
96 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
97 2 2 1.0 0.008 0.139 0%
98 2 1 1.0 0.008 0.110 0%
99 2 1 1.0 0.008 0.110 0%
100 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
101 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
102 1 1 0.5 0.004 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.